To maintain and enhance the scientific quality of publications, GENCARE: Journal of Community Service in Health invites qualified academics, healthcare professionals, and practitioners to serve as peer reviewers. Reviewers play a crucial role in ensuring that submitted manuscripts meet appropriate scholarly, ethical, practical, and methodological standards before publication.

---

Reviewer Qualifications

Prospective reviewers should meet the following qualifications:

• Hold at least a Master's degree, preferably a Doctoral degree, in health sciences or a related discipline
• Possess expertise relevant to the journal's scope, such as nursing, midwifery, medicine, pharmacy, nutrition, public health, dentistry, physiotherapy, rehabilitation, mental health, health promotion, health technology, or other health-related fields
• Have knowledge or experience in community service, community empowerment, health education, community-based intervention, or health promotion programs
• Have prior experience reviewing scholarly manuscripts, preferably for national or international journals
• Have published scholarly works in reputable national or international journals
• Have no conflict of interest with the manuscript, authors, institutions, or community partners involved

---

Review Criteria

In evaluating manuscripts, reviewers are expected to assess the following components:

Relevance and Originality

• Is the topic relevant to the scope of GENCARE?
• Does the manuscript address a meaningful health problem or community need?
• Does the program demonstrate innovation, adaptation, or added value compared with previous community service activities?
• Is the contribution of the activity to health improvement or community empowerment clearly demonstrated?

Title and Abstract

• Does the title accurately reflect the community service activity?
• Is the title concise, informative, and relevant?
• Does the abstract clearly summarize the background, community problem, objectives, methods or intervention, results, and conclusion?
• Are the keywords appropriate and representative of the manuscript?

Introduction

• Is the background of the community or partner problem clearly described?
• Is the health problem supported by relevant evidence, data, or scientific literature?
• Is the rationale for the community service program clearly explained?
• Are the objectives of the activity clearly stated?

Methods / Community Service Methods

• Is the target community, partner, population, or setting clearly described?
• Are the location and duration of the activity clearly stated?
• Are the intervention, education, empowerment, training, screening, or other activities described in sufficient detail?
• Are the stages of preparation, implementation, and evaluation clearly explained?
• Is community or partner participation adequately described?
• Are evaluation methods, instruments, or indicators appropriate?
• Are ethical approval, institutional permission, informed consent, or participant protection stated where required?

Results

• Are the results of the community service activity clearly presented?
• Are changes in knowledge, skills, behavior, health indicators, capacity, or other relevant outcomes adequately reported?
• Are tables, figures, photographs, and other documentation relevant and informative?
• Do the reported results correspond to the stated objectives?
• Are claims of impact supported by appropriate data or evidence?

Discussion

• Are the results interpreted appropriately?
• Are findings compared with relevant scientific literature or previous community programs?
• Are factors supporting or limiting program implementation discussed?
• Are practical implications for health services, community empowerment, or future community activities discussed?
• Is the sustainability or potential replication of the program considered?
• Are limitations of the activity appropriately acknowledged?

Community Engagement and Sustainability

• Was the community or partner meaningfully involved in the activity?
• Does the program demonstrate empowerment rather than only one-way service delivery?
• Are there efforts to ensure sustainability after the activity ends?
• Can the program potentially be adapted or replicated in other communities?

Conclusion

• Does the conclusion accurately reflect the results?
• Does it address the objectives of the community service activity?
• Does it highlight the practical benefit or contribution to the target community?
• Are recommendations realistic and relevant?

References

• Are the references relevant, current, and credible?
• Are key scientific sources included?
• Are references used appropriately to support the background and discussion?
• Are citations and references consistent with the journal's required style?

Writing Quality and Structure

• Is the manuscript logically organized and easy to follow?
• Is the academic language clear, concise, and professional?
• Are tables, figures, and photographs appropriately labeled and explained?
• Does the manuscript comply with GENCARE author guidelines?

---

Reviewer Recommendations

After completing the evaluation, reviewers may recommend one of the following:

• Accept without revision
• Minor Revision
• Major Revision
• Reject

Reviewers are encouraged to provide constructive, specific, and professional comments that help authors improve the scientific quality, clarity, community relevance, and practical contribution of the manuscript.

---

Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers

• Maintain strict confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
• Provide objective, fair, and unbiased feedback
• Disclose any conflicts of interest
• Decline the review if the manuscript is outside the reviewer's expertise
• Report potential plagiarism, duplicate publication, data manipulation, ethical violations, or other misconduct
• Respect the privacy and confidentiality of participants and community partners
• Do not use unpublished manuscript content for personal or professional advantage
• Do not upload confidential manuscripts into publicly accessible AI tools or other unauthorized platforms
• Complete the review within the agreed timeframe

By participating in peer review, reviewers contribute to maintaining the quality, credibility, integrity, and community relevance of scholarly publishing in GENCARE: Journal of Community Service in Health.